skip to main | skip to sidebar

Dream High Voltage

Saturday, April 23, 2011

5 No-planer Claims Refuted



This is for anyone who still thinks the no-plane theories have any credibility. Please consider this my public statement about no-plane theories: They have no merit and are all wrong.

Related Info:

Debunking "September Clues" and "No Plane" Theories

The plane does decelerate:

Interpreting the Boeing-767 Deceleration During Impact with the WTC Tower

The F=MA argument

No "TV Fakery":

A Critical Review of WTC 'No Plane' Theories

Letter Added to A Critical Review of WTC 'No Plane' Theories

Rebuttal of Ace Baker's "Chopper 5 Composite" Analysis

DEBUNKING “SEPTEMBER CLUES” A POINT-BY-POINT ANALYSIS

September Clues - Busted! U-Tube version

South Towers Anomalies -- Busted!

Impossible speed? No:

Simulator Proves “Impossible Speed” was “probable” for Flt 11 and Flt 175

9/11: Impossible Speed & Impact -- Busted!

9/11: Possible or Impossible Speed?

Can planes penetrate steel structures? Yes:

9/11 No Planer Open your eyes War Planes vs Steel

There were reliable witnesses to the crashes:

No Planes Theory: R.I.P.

9/11 — Plane Impacts: Real or Faked?
Posted by Maklur Gethoo at 6:15 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: 9/11 disinformation, 9/11 no plane theories, CGI holograms 9/11, no-planers 9/11, Tv-Fakery, World Trade Center no-plane theories

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Followers

Blog Archive

About Me

Maklur Gethoo
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.
 
My Ping in TotalPing.com
Preview on Feedage: dream-high-voltage Add to My Yahoo! Add to Google! Add to AOL! Add to MSN
Subscribe in NewsGator Online Add to Netvibes Subscribe in Pakeflakes Subscribe in Bloglines Add to Alesti RSS Reader
Add to Feedage.com Groups Add to Windows Live iPing-it Add to Feedage RSS Alerts Add To Fwicki
Add to Spoken to You
Feedage Grade A rated